Publication ethics
Publication Ethics
The Editorial Board of the journal Scientific Works “Adilet” adheres to the following principles of publication ethics in its activities.
I. Principles of Professional Ethics in the Activities of the Editor and Publisher
- ✓ When making a decision on publication, the editor is guided by the reliability of the submitted data and the scholarly significance of the manuscript.
- ✓ The editor shall evaluate the intellectual content of manuscripts regardless of the authors’ race, gender, religious beliefs, origin, citizenship, social status, or political views.
- ✓ The editor must not allow for publication any material if there are sufficient grounds to believe that it constitutes plagiarism.
- ✓ The editor shall not disregard complaints and must take all necessary measures to restore violated rights.
- ✓ The editor has the right to reject a manuscript without external peer review if it does not correspond to the journal’s scope.
- ✓ Individuals with a conflict of interest regarding a particular manuscript must be excluded from the decision-making process.
- ✓ The editorial office ensures transparency, maintains confidentiality throughout all stages, and prevents the use of unpublished materials.
- ✓ The journal ensures a double-blind peer review process for all submitted manuscripts.
II. Duties and Rights of the Editor
Duties of the Editor:
- ✓ To make publication decisions based exclusively on scholarly significance.
- ✓ To ensure confidentiality at all stages of manuscript evaluation.
- ✓ Not to use unpublished data for personal purposes.
- ✓ To check all submitted manuscripts for plagiarism using licensed anti-plagiarism systems.
Rights of the Editor:
- ✓ To reject a manuscript without peer review if it does not meet the journal’s scope.
- ✓ To request additional materials or primary data from authors.
- ✓ To make the final decision based on peer review reports.
- ✓ To exclude reviewers in cases of conflict of interest.
III. Ethical Principles in the Activities of the Reviewer
The reviewer shall conduct scholarly evaluation in an impartial and objective manner.
Duties of the Reviewer:
- ✓ To agree to review only manuscripts within their field of competence.
- ✓ To maintain confidentiality and not to disclose the manuscript to third parties.
- ✓ To provide an objective and well-reasoned assessment of the research results.
- ✓ Not to use unpublished data for personal purposes.
- ✓ To inform the editorial office of any plagiarism or substantial similarities.
- ✓ To decline participation in the review process in the event of a conflict of interest.
Rights of the Reviewer:
- ✓ To decline review if lacking the necessary competence.
- ✓ To receive all necessary materials for evaluation.
- ✓ To recommend acceptance, revision, or rejection of the manuscript.
IV. Duties and Rights of Authors
Duties of the Author:
- ✓ To present accurate and reliable research results.
- ✓ To ensure the complete originality of the manuscript and properly cite all sources.
- ✓ Not to submit the same manuscript to multiple journals simultaneously.
- ✓ To include as co-authors only those who have made a significant contribution.
- ✓ To promptly notify the editorial office of any errors identified.
- ✓ To disclose sources of funding and any conflicts of interest.
Rights of the Author:
- ✓ To an objective and impartial evaluation and confidentiality.
- ✓ To review anonymized peer review reports and receive a reasoned decision.
- ✓ To respond to reviewers’ comments and revise the manuscript.
- ✓ To withdraw the manuscript at any stage prior to the final decision.
V. Conflict of Interest and Unethical Behavior
The editorial office makes every effort to prevent unethical behavior and strictly follows COPE recommendations.
1. Conflict of Interest
Authors must disclose any potential conflicts of interest. Reviewers must notify the editorial office and decline to review if a conflict exists. Editors must recuse themselves from decision-making if they have a conflict of interest.
2. Unethical Behavior
The editorial office considers the following unacceptable: fake peer reviews, agency services, falsification of authorship, copyright infringement, citation manipulation, plagiarism, and data fabrication.
3. Retraction and Corrections
If serious errors, falsification, or plagiarism are detected, a retraction procedure is initiated. For minor errors, a corrigendum or errata is published.
VI. Policy on the Use of Generative AI
- ✓ Authors must disclose the use of AI tools in preparing the manuscript (including the extent and nature).
- ✓ AI cannot be listed as a co-author, as it cannot take responsibility for the results.
- ✓ The editorial office reserves the right to reject articles where AI generated the core content without critical analysis by the author.
- ✓ The responsibility for originality and reliability lies entirely with the authors.
VII. Borrowings and Anti-Plagiarism
The editorial office mandatorily checks all submitted manuscripts for borrowings using a licensed anti-plagiarism system.
In cases where these values are exceeded, the editorial office follows COPE standard procedures.
Strict Ban on Plagiarism
Plagiarism in any form is considered a gross violation of ethical principles and will result in the immediate rejection of the manuscript. In the event of proven plagiarism exceeding 50% or intentional text manipulation, the authors of such an article will be banned from submitting materials to the journal for 3 calendar years (both as authors and co-authors).
VIII. Final Provisions
The journal Scientific Works “Adilet” reserves the right to reject any manuscript submitted for publication that does not comply with the above principles.
The editorial office is guided by international standards of publication ethics (including COPE guidelines) and makes every effort to prevent violations of academic integrity.